The Mudcat Café TM
Thread #135021 Message #3077977
Posted By: Bill D
19-Jan-11 - 12:40 PM
Thread Name: BS: Ubuntu Hell
Subject: RE: BS: Ubuntu Hell
and one more post from one of the most dependable folks in that group, answering a question:
> As far as I am not familiar with AndLinux/coLinux ( even if aware about > the former ), > how would you compare performance, stability, usability and security of > Linux-In-Windows solutions > compared to Linux Guest on Windows host ( e.g. VirtualBox ) ?
Depends on what you want. I use VirtualBox as it give me the situation of running a guest operating system integrated seamlessly into the host operating system. For example Mandriva Linux as the host and XP totally integrated into the Linux desktop (Gnome, KDE, Xfce, whichever).
If you're only looking to run a few Linux programs then one of the solutions in this thread may be better. VirtualBox is more resource intensive but gives you a mass of virtualisation options. I've never had stability problems with VirtualBox and as far as security concerns go I'd be a hell of a lot more worried about Windows security!