"And what has your contribution been Lox?
Your position is just that all minorities are above criticism, and no culture may be questioned."

Interesting tactic.

Responding to things I haven't said, but ignoring the things I have said.


"How can you be certain (CERTAIN!!) that men, made to marry late but deprived of any intimate relationships, might not be, just very slightly, predisposed?"


Another ridiculous argument.

Pay attention to the refutation so you remember it.


You could say this about any influence - what paper they read, whether they live near power lines, whether they have beards, whether they were abducted by aliens.


Without EVIDENCE that any of these things are responsible for crimninals trafficking in young women, all these suggestions, including yours, are just hair brained nonsense.

You still have no evidence to support your claim and you still concentrate solely on one factor that dribves these criminals to their crime to the exclusion of all other variables.

HHow do you know it isn't their food, or the absence of alcohol, or a reaction to the cold weather and rain?

Are they all possible reasons?

Yes.

But there is NO EVIDENCE suggesting these things are true, hence they are just imaginary constructs.

Like your hypothesis Keith.

It is an imaginary construct and there is NO EVIDENCE to back it up.


Now please concentrate and try to digest that refutation and then try to remember it so that you won't have to ask me to repeat it later.

The basic substance of it may already be familiar depending on how bad your menory loss is.


Thank you for confirming your position though - I deleted "inevitable" and replaced it with "slight" and got this:

"their culture inspires a slight predisposition to the grooming and abuse of underage girls"

Can you confirm that that is your opinion of British Pakistanis?

Do you belueve that British Pakistanbi culture inspires a greater propensity for child abuse than other cultures? or is this just a meaningless statement that applies to all cultures.


Because that would confirm for sure whether you are proposing a bigotted hypothesis or a genuinely considered one.

The absence of any other suggestions combined with the above sentence, with "slight" substituted for "inevitable" doesn't bode well for you.



MtheGM, I'm glad I've pissed you off as that was clearly your intention when you posted to this thread.

In addition, you are in no position to comment about foul language.

I hope you like your reflection.