'Then how am I supposed to debate?'
With a degree of sensitivity and knowledge the subject requires, which you obviously don't posess, with an awareness of the consequences of misrepresenting the subject (which was warned about in one of your own examples and which you dismissed as 'a typical Guardian headline') and without the 'agenda' the number and nature of your postings and your outrageous 'cultural' analysis carries with it.
"precious dogma."
What precious dogma - I believe your contribution to this thread paints a grotesque and distorted view of the British-Pakistani population, one projected continually by organisations like the BNP. Exposing that view as the oft repeated lie that it is, is my only agenda.
"You still deny it"
Where do I deny it - I challenged your 'impeccible sources' claim, I don't believe impeccible sources on the question of race exist, at least certainly not among politicians. As I keep repeating and you keep ignoring the reseach simply hasn't been carried out on this subject I have neither questioned nor accepted anything your sources have had to say; if anybody has done that, it is you who passed off the warning of one of them as 'a typical Guardian headline'. - I simply don't know the FULL facts any more than you do. You are still unable to produce one scrap qualitative or quantitive documentation on the events described - how do they represent the Pakistan population or its culture, as you have claimed they do?
"And that makes me racist?"
The volume and nature of your postings and the conclusions you appear to draw from your handful of examples is what makes you a racist.
"If you did not deny the experience of every witness I put up, and every bit of hard evidence"
Where did I do this?
Jim Carroll