From Fluids: "I could get the full file down but "to add to debate in a folk music forum" isn't a good enough excuse. I do know, as was made public by her employer, that after due warnings as per their HR polices, she was referred to the Nurses and Midwifery Council (NMC) and the case was dropped after she agreed that her approach was not consistent with the expectations of her registration. As a result, she was reinstated."

What an extraordinary concept, even by your standards, Fluids.   Can you cite the prohibition the nurse was alleged to have breached?    There was a long thread here that set out the alleged offence and the excuses for the management. The NMC had the power (being judge, jury, and executioner in its own cause) permanently to exclude Nurse Petrie from her job, and she was thereby blackmailed into a "soft option".   I have some parallel experience in that I successfully saw off a trumped up allegation against me to the SRA by a judge who was displaying racial prejudice against a barrister instructed by me, and who tried just the same sledgehammer approach to head off my reporting him on the grounds of his prejudicial conduct. If what you say about your regulatory activities is true, it seems that you are on the side of the oppressors. Now why doesn't that surprise me?