"Authors of the first independent academic analysis looking at "on-street grooming", where young girls, spotted outside, including at the school gates, have become targets, said they were concerned that data from a small, geographically concentrated, sample of cases had been "generalised to an entire crime type"."

Thats what the authors said.

They were concerned that the research they carried out was being generalized to an entire crime type.

They were concerned because people like keith are sying it is a new crime type WHEN IT ISN'T ONE.

But the results and conclusions of the researchers are irrelevant according to Keith.

The only proof he needs is the fact that ALLEGATIONS have been reported and that an investigation has been carried out.

It does not interest him that the investigators conclusions flatly CONTRADICT his view.

2 months selling a racist hypothesis ... and twice referring to my Irish Nationality as if to suggest that it somehow delegitimizes my arguments ... thankyou for clarifying your agenda.