"Jim, I believe in the over-representation."
Sorry Keith; doesn't work like that.
You have said - in full:
"Don I do now " believe that " but only because of the testimony of all those knowledgeable people, and always acknowledging that only a tiny minority succumb."
Simple, straigtforward, uncomplicated; you put that forward because you believed it. As far as I can see, nobody else has said it; it is your summing up of what you believe.
It was not correct for me to have described it simply as racist.
The Pakistani bit makes it racist, the Muslim bit makes it bigoted, the male bit makes it sexist; it is a racist, bigoted and sexist attack on Pakistani, Muslim men.
The 'genetic implant tendency' puts it on par with the excuse that the Nazis put forward for the extermination of six million Jews, and the sterilition of many so the genetic fault could not be passed on - it is a racist statement of the worst kind.
Your stumbling efforts to explain your statement away, first by misrepresenting Nazi history and then, breathtakingly, eventually claiming "No Jim, I did not put it up as an argument at all" makes you an extremely stupid and dishonest individual.
Your claiming that you only put it up because "It was proposed by highly authoritative, reputable people including BPs" (perhaps you can point out who has claimed "all male Pakistani Muslims have a culturally implanted tendency"), makes you not only stupid, but extremely cowardly in lacking the courage to stand by what you have said, and what you obviously believe.
So we are left with a stupid, lying, cowardly, racist, sexist bigot who is prepared to put forward the oldest racist weapon in the book, genetic deficiancy, to show that male, Muslim Pakistanis are genetically inclined towards paedophelia.
Do you take bookings?
Jim Carroll