"Any open minded person would agree."
Then you and your two silent friends are the only ones with open minds - do I have that right?
You have proved nothing and you have answered nothing - do yourself a favour and count the number of criminals involved in underage sex from your own 'evidence', find what percentage that number is of one-and-a-half million and tell me how you come up with "massive over-reperesentation" and "all male Pakistani Muslims have a culturally implanted tendency towards paedophelia".
You have yet to acknowledge the FACT that the 'evidence' you have mustered here is unqualified and localised and has comes from unqualified people not in the position, nor having the skill to make whoesale judgements, and so can have no possible significance to the British Pakistani population as a whole.
From the 'evidence' available to us all, that is the only way you will get the vaguest idea of what is happening, never mind being able to make such racist definitive statements you have made - statements that would have put you behind bars for incitement to race hatred had you made them elsewhere.
"Passing reference! Passing lie"
In fact it was Akenaton who first made reference to the subject of gangs and underage abuse (23 Jan 11 - 05:19 AM), Lox made passing reference to it and then you took it up (23 Jan 11 - 09:43 AM) - but it is you and you alone who has made this thread the racist attack on the Pakistani community that it became under your guidance.
Were I to take a leaf out of your book I would accuse you of lying, but I have no doubt it was an honest mistake on your part.
You have still not responded to any of my points - particularly why you will not even refer to white, christian criminals and prefer to stick to British Pakistani ones which, on your admission, you have neither knowledge nor experience of.
I ask again; is there any cultural significance in the report that over one in ten teenagers in Northern Ireland have admitted to having been sexually groomed, 75% of these being under age.
If your answer is still that you are not qualified to give an answer, in the light of your own admittance that you have neither experience nor knowledge of the subject under present discussion, what gives you the authority to make the sweeping racist statements you have here?
Jim Carroll