Ok..I re-read it, as per requested, by you.
Let me call your attention to one particular part..(Note my inserted caps):
"This all goes to show that the United States fumbled a little bit when Obama administration officials quickly CHANGED their story surrounding the precise details of Bin Laden's death. First, they said, he raised a weapon to resist –so the shooting was clearly justified and legal. NOW, THEY SAY, he was making other threatening gestures, which would also justify his killing. However, IF he was shot while trying to surrender then the legality of his killing becomes less clear."

Again, let me re-iterate,"...How do you KNOW he was 'making threatening gestures'?...the 'news'?....given by who??? Same with ALL these 'reports'."

You will notice through my posts regarding this, that when using the words 'news' and 'reports' I always put them in quotation marks, because, frankly, to believe any of these sources, as truth, is nonsense! The only TRUTH that comes from the White House, the administration-S, is usually only by co-incidence!..not accuracy in 'reporting'....and if you've noticed, even on the press briefings, the 'explanations' are usually left 'open-ended', just in case they need to be embellished!..Which they often do!
Personally, I think trusting EVERYTHING that they utter, is just that, UTTER NONSENSE!

Thanks for the heads up, though.

GfS