Keith's racist conclusions are based on no more than a couple of hundred criminals at most.
His selecting a certain method used in pimping is, as far as I'm concerned, an attempt to implicate the Pakistani culture as a whole in a crime that, as has been stated by his own sources, one which crosses all racial barriers, the vast majority being white British.
He has further stated that it is a cultural tendency which promotes paedophila in the Pakistani community.
This is blatent racist stereotyping of the most extreme kind - not stupid 'black men have big willies' nonsense, but hard-line racism.
He has cited one member of the Pakistani community (a member of the House of Lords), along with a couple of politicians and a comparatively tiny handful of cases; totally ignoring the outrage within the Pakistani communities that these accusations have elicited - why should the word of 1 British peer carry more weight than that of those still living in the communities?
If Keith's accusation is to be accepted, every Pakistani living in Britain is never again to be trusted within a mile of a child - that is the logical conclusion of his statement.
Please don't come wingeing about being accused of being a racist - your statement is a racist one, your continud attempts to prove British Pakistanis are cultural paedophiles is a racist act (a hard fought campaign, from the efforts you have put in here), and your cynical manipulation of non-existant research and the ignoring and editing of your own evidence makes you a classic racist.
This is Keith's opinion, no matter who else he attempts to hide behind, thank you for giving me the opportunity to make that clear on the appropriate thread, I'll leave you to your wallowing and get on with my life.
Jim Carroll