"Jim's entirely inapposite & confusing adducing of a nurse's abuse of a 6 year old boy,"
Jack Straw made the point that paedophelia in Britain was an overwhelmingly white indigenous crime (removed by Keith in his quote).
I produced a current example of a case and could have, had I followed Keith's example and dredged the net, provided many, many more.
I then asked, following Keith's example, whether this could be described as a British white crime.
It seems somewhat ingenuous do describe my doing what Keith has done throughout this thread as 'inaposite'.
Also, your somewhat free interpretation of the piece of provided as "abuse of a six year old boy" seems a little watered-down - hope you haven't caught Keith's disease - or maybe that's what a fairy godmother does.
"Paul Wilson admitted two counts of raping a girl aged two or three years old and a further 45 charges of making and distributing indecent images and inciting youngsters to engage in sexual activity on the internet."
"Don't run away Jim."
I'm not running anywhere - you have made your 'cultural' statements over and over again, you have ignored every single point I have raised here and your stance;
"let us accept that this is a crime that the culture (not the religion) of the Pakistani community is largely responsible for."
Then you said (after fine tuning to slight):
"You said of Ake and me "you are suggesting that their culture inspires an inevitable predisposition to the grooming and abuse of underage girls,
Delete "inevitable" with "slight" and that, for me, is fair comment."
remains exactly as it was at the beginning.
My opinion is that you are a racist uttering racist commonplaces and stereotypes; prove them with collected and analysed data, not isolated examples.
Until you do, you remain a racist in my opinion and, I believe that of others on this thread.
As far as I am concerned, it is no longer of value trying to hold a conversation with a parrot who can only repeat what others have said, without explanation or understading.
Jim Carroll