""Enough about me, have you had any more thoughts about why the over-rep and if it is real?""

Christ, it's worse than trying to nail jelly to a tree.

Read and thoroughly digest the whole of the following comment from a man every bit as knowledgeable as your "sources":-

But Peter Davies, the director of the Child Exploitation and Online Protection centre (Ceop), which carried out the research, warned against jumping to conclusions on the ethnicity of offenders because the data gathered by his investigators was incomplete, not nationwide and of poor quality.

"I would send a note of caution about trying to extrapolate anything from this."

He seems to be agreeing with my position that before drawing the cultural conclusions which you have advanced, you need to consider the position nationwide. This you have refused even to discuss.

Add that to my posts on the dubious nature of statistics when a sufficiently large and representative sample is absent.

Then re-consider, and come to the conclusion that facts don't matter and you are always right. That is what you have been doing since January 24th 2011.

Don T.