Who needs to defend something they did not say?

Unclear. You'll have to be more specific. If, by chance, you are referring to my challenge to GfS to clarify his contradictory remarks, I was blindingly clear about which remarks.

You are making statements that you need to defend.

Unclear. You'll have to be more specific. Which statements?

Filngin insults is the way the Tea Party haters operate.

Unclear. You'll have to be more specific. If by some chance you are saying that I was flinging insults, or expressing hatefulness, tell me what struck you that way and I'll tell you why I said it.

And finally it is the Democrats who are now overspending and diluting your savings.

Yep. They all do it. As of now, I still have some money for retirement. Shutting down the government for uncompromising ideological reasons, however, is a whole different ballgame. A lot of very smart people tell us it could cause a depression and wipe everyone out entirely.

You seem to be saying that it is OK for the Tea Party to ruin our economy because Democrats have spent money that didn't have enough revenue to support it. You also, by extension of the logical structure of you statement, seem to be saying the Republicans have been model protectors of our economy. Do you really think so?

Did the Tea Party ruin people's retirements in Greece?

BZZTT!! Non-sequiter!! Does not compute!!

"Give us what we want or we will shoot this economy!"
Who said that? You said it and you are trying to put the words in some else's mouth

I don't know -- I didn't say it, and didn't say that anyone else said it. Jeez, Lazy McLazy, the post you are responding to was only a few posts ago. Wake up!