I will instantly put in the right of everyone to live free from the threat of attack. I would not ask an oppressed people to humiliate themselves by having to say a country has the right to exist. I would put it in more businesslike terms that I have explained before..that it does exist and it is not going away and civilities will be practiced..but why insist on something that will stick so in their craw? The objective is to have security and safety for all.

Did I say a DMZ in Palestine? No, I did not. I would assume it would be shared by both countries from their lands where settlers are now settling. Obviously disputed territory.

Yes..there are times when people have to be killed if they are intruders, terrorists, etc. and are endangering others severely and there is no other way to subdue them.

Sometimes walls are the only way to control a situation. But they have to have little openings, securely guarded, where people have ingress and egress and vegetables from the destroyed but hopefully now rebuilt greenhouses can get through. mg