Well. well.   

That certainly is an unanswerable argument, full of the calm reasoning and logic you are known for and full of evidence buttressing your case.   I would have expected no less from you,    And taking up your accustomed place in the gutter too.   Situation normal.






Some Mudcat atheists, some of the usual suspects being found on this thread, have no problem making frequent aggressive arguments on religion and the religious. Yet for some reason they object to being called on to defend the conduct of some prominent atheists:   Hitler, Stalin, and Mao.

Gee, I wonder why that is.

And I am neither religious nor atheist. Just a modest-- (I prefer that to "simple"---I'm sure you won't mind) seeker after truth.

Look, it's simple. Either you can defend the conduct of these three--together responsible for more deaths than anyone else in history-- or you cannot,.