If that 'one supporter' is supposed to be me, JC, then I neither support nor oppose it as a statement; my position is simply that you persistently deny Keith a fair hearing because of a personal vendetta you are obsessed by, based on remarks you allege him to have made on other threads which have long since vanished into the ewigkeit. As to the rights & wrongs of his adoption of the views of those other pundits, I make no comment* ~ except that he is as entitled to believe them as you are to disbelieve them: provided that you do it with enough integrity to avoid the sort of paltering with the truth which I demonstrated you to have been indulging in, re Bobad's post, a few posts back.