The Mudcat Café TM
Thread #141076   Message #3264730
Posted By: beardedbruce
28-Nov-11 - 08:35 AM
Thread Name: Palestine (continuation)
Subject: RE: Palestine (continuation)
Jim,

"the biggest massacre of civilians since WW2 -"

Nice to see that you group Rwandans, Cambodians, and Croations with Jews as not worthy of your concern, and not to be considered as human beings.


Of course, to expect you to bother with the truth has been shown to be a pointless task.



Still waiting for you toa address the questions, instead of telling lies.



"The rest of your questions have been long answered - (eye-for-an-eye - remember) - maybe you have the same type of dislexia that Keith has been suffering from for so long."

As usual, you answer with an outright lie...


MY questions were NOT "an eye for an eye". I was asking if you thought it better for Israel to

1. Continue to treat the Palestinians the way they are presently
2. OR Treat the Palestinians the way the Arab Moslims have treated the Jews,
3. OR Treat the Palestinians the way the Other Arab Moslim States have treated the Palestinians.


I understand you may not want to consider answering a question, when you can rant about the person who disagrees with you, but I would like to know which YOU think is the best course of action for the Palestinians to hope for.



BTW

IF you think my facts are made up, try arguing about THEM instead of attacking me- You might even get some agreement with your views, IF YOU PRESENT FACTS with support instead of the rumors and lies you have been posting

"you are the one who suggested that they have no right to their homeland."

No I stated that they have no right to the Jewish Homeland, and DO have the right to the Arab Moslim Homeland of TransJordan.

YOU have stated that Jews have no right to the Jewish Homeland, repeatedly, and NO right to any of the lands Jews were driven from in 1948.







",No it isn't you Zionist little shit.
...
Now go and learn some simple manners
Best wishes,
Jim Carroll"


seems to sum up your entire argument. Hardly a valid discussion of the merits of any arguement.