quoting from my own post above, (with enhancements)...(which no one seems to have read. Perhaps pete******* will)

" No one claims that tetrapods, if those 'indentations' are really tracks, are direct decedents of tiktaalek. Evolution happens in many parallel lines, not in ...ummm.. 'single file'. . Not only that, but Poland is not near Canada! If tetrapod tracks...or better...bones...had been found WITH tiktaalek, it might have been good evidence... of something.
It is interesting that Creation.com even uses that argument, because they don't even recognize that 'beings' could BE that old! So how can they interpret evidence they don't even allow AS evidence?"