"It is madness to cite Teribus and me as evidence for sniper rounds when we both refute it."
This is now the sixth explanation from you of this documented and authenticated sale. You have altered your story, not as new facts are revealed, but as a convenience to your own particular needs in the argument - the latest (a couple of days ago) being that you were confusing it with Libya.
I have never known two (sorry - three, remembering our absent hirsute friend) people lie and distort in pursuit of a nasty political agenda.
You have never attempted to explain your lies, you've now ceased to deny them.
Why should we believe the latest one?
Fact - the British government sold 'missiles/projectiles that kill people to a terrorist regime that was noted for torturing, murdering and imprisoning its people.
Whatever they were - (I'm prepared to accept them as sniper bullets based on your arguments) the sale was fully in line with its stated policy of selling arms to despotic regimes "We do trade with governments that are not democratic and have bad human rights records".
You have yet to produce evidence that the license of sale was cancelled and the order not fulfilled...... can I breathe again now?
Ahhhhhh - that's better
The more you deny these facts the bigger liar you become (checked the length of your nose lately?)
"That is not British Government's line."
The Govenment's stated policy was made clear on Question Time by a senior government minister - for the reasons I have stated - a mistrust of what kind of leadership a democratic Syria would produce.
This has been borne out by Britain's failure to take any steps to intervene in the slaughter, not even to restrict in any way Assad's gofer in London (so far totally ignored by you)
Now - unless you have anything new (like evidence) to add.......
Jim Carroll