Not

"because - he is a Muslim -",

Jim. Because he is an Islamist [a form of what you will, in your scattergun fashion, call 'madness']. You are not so thick as not to see the distinction, for all your pretending that no such distinction exists because it won't suit your preconceptions. Your extension of the 'abuse' responsibility to the 'hierarchy' is no kind of reply to my having pointed out your misuse of the term 'churchman'.

What 'double standards'. Indicate where you purport to have detected any basis for such an accusation in any recent post of mine ~~ or any post at any time, for that matter...

Your desperately confused arguments are doing your intellectual repute no credit.

~M~