The problem there is inherent in the terminology Jack.

It begs the question "whose truth"?....Once you slide off unambiguous terms such as "theory", "evidence", reproducible experiment", "knowledge" and "proof", into subjective realms such as "belief", "truth" etc., you open the door for YECs like Pete to say "My truth is truer than yours".

To cite scientific evidence, you need to do so scientifically, and although I deplore Snail's campaign of dislike and disdain toward Steve, I do feel that on this one point he is essentially correct.

Don T.