Along with my premise of our 'representatives' NOT representing their constituents, but rather the big 'special interest' money guys, and much like my Clinton question, explain this....

Bobert: "There is not one liberal alive who didn't want a single payer system....."

....except the ones who voted for it....why was that???....and just WHY? You are supporting them, but they are NOT supporting you! What gives here?

Frankly, I, who you think is such a 'right winger, Cracked Teapot' would have been supporting that, as well...even Kucinich, who i thought was more 'on'......but they didn't...ever ask yourselves, "What was in the provisions of the bill, that made that such an imperative???"...and THAT'S where the devil lurks in the details!!!...NOT in the government providing health care...all the other stuff that hinges on those 'benefits' to someone(?), for NOT having a single payer....which, same provisions puts it up in the Supreme Court!!!...AND have a LOT of VERY Sane people, bailing OUT, on supporting the bill.
Can't you understand that???

So, now you have TWO (related) questions to answer...and YOU brought it up!
Could this be as stupid, or deceptive as Clinton NOT vetoing the repeal, of Glass-Steagall??????

What are the Democrats spinning about this?..Surely, any 'concerned liberal Democrat' would have to want SOME explanation...even if it was just 'spin'....

Your turn.

GfS