"".i suppose it can be reproduced next time a rocket goes by!""

No, it doesn't work like that.

Reproducible evidence is not just a case of the same pseudo scientist spouting the same bollocks again and again.

To be acceptable, it must be repeatable by any competent specialist in the particular field and produce the same result, within reasonable experimental parameters.

Your man is one lone self styled "Creation Scientist" who demands belief because he states that "such and such" is the case. Come back and talk about him again when his conclusions have been tested, confirmed and verified by half a dozen non Creationist (i.e. REAL) scientists.

Don T.