"You call me dishonest when I never lie."
You lie and distort constantly Keith - and when challenged and presented with contrary evidence you refuse to withdraw your distortions - plenty of examples to be had here on this thread and elsewhere.
You are lying here about the "sniper ammunition" - you identified it as such, then realising what a foot-in-mouth you had made (at a time when snipers were slaughtering civilians in Homs) you then presented tha host of different explanations for the sale (which is officially documented),
Here's a sample.
"A private individual applied for the licence to supply."
"I know that a licence was issued years ago for much less than a year's supply of ammunition."
"A licence was issued and revoked for some small arms ammunition, but probably none supplied."
"The licence was revoked and I do not believe that any was supplied."
"Your Guardian "data blog" refers to one licence for a small amount of small arms ammunition.
"So one individual bought some cheap ammo on the international market and sold it on."
"Not British ammunition."
"....and the licence was revoked."
These have all been made up by you - you have provided no evidence for any of them.
Sorry Keith - that is lying, whichever colour you choose to paint it.
"I am no racist and it follows that I have never made any racist post.
"
Describing the entire male British Pakistani population as being "cultually implanted" to make them paedophiles is a racist post.
Attributing it to a politician and then failing to provide evidence, is being a lying racist.
These are not "personal attacks" - they are responses to what I believe to be your racist and untruthful statements.
You are lying now - you have said you explained your "mistake" about the sniper bullets - you haven't - if you have, where is that explanation.
I don't know you, I have never met you, I don't want to meet you, I find your reviews repulsive.
For the sake of this forum, please leave me alone - go and do your 'old man of the sea' act with someone else.
Jim Carroll