Ebbie ~ Sorry, but do not get your (sarcastic?) point. If the thing did happen as some of us suspect it might have done, then of course the driver was not a knowing or willing part of the operation, but a collateral casualty. And why was he drunk? - he was a professional driver: would he have got so of his own volition?

I repeat ~~ this is obviously speculative; but the whole thing - like, I say again, M Monroe's not altogether dissimilar fate, about which similar theories exist - was just so astonishingly peculiarly convenient to the Establishment, wasn't it?

~M~