WS: I won't argue the point, I agree that that subject has pretty well been hashed over. I don't believe, however, that the lawyers asking the questions were probably privy to information regarding when the impropriety began and stopped. It was a poorly worded question, I agree, but perhaps Clinton could merely have answered "no" to that question, and saved himself a lot of barbs about what the meaning of the word "is" is.

:>)

DougR