I know all about Arianna Huffington, née Staissinopoulos, who was second ever woman to be President of the Cambridge Union, a post she almost certainly secured purely by the lavish expenditure of £s sterling, thank you John. In fact, we knew her very slightly at that time. But what her biography has to do with a feature on the subject of this thread in one of her papers I am at a loss to understand. Is your point that, because you disagree with some of her antecedents and attitudes, nothing published in any of her press can possibly be true in any of its details? Or, if not, what?

~M~

Not but what that could be the attitude of some of the more doctrinaire boobies who haunt some of these threads, to be sure; but not you, I trust!