darwin dogma has hindered science as i previously demonstrated.

Well, I haven't got the time to address all the rest of the drivel in your post, but let's just take a look at this little gem. It contains three bare-faced lies, so well done! The first is that there is such a thing as "Darwin dogma". There is a theory of natural selection on which thousands of scientists have worked hard, using the scientific method, to add further corroborating evidence or to refute. That is not how dogma is arrived at. As you yourself are the king of blind dogma, I'm amazed you made that mistake. Second, that Darwin's work hindered science. In fact, Darwin's big idea revolutionised biology and is still doing so. The only thing that Darwin hindered was the continuing occupation of the place usurped by the God squad for their non-existent hero in the great scheme of things. Third, that you "demonstrated" that Darwin hindered science. That is such an incredibly ignorant and insulting remark, but I can't work up much annoyance because I'm so busy laughing at your crass stupidity.