There. Morticia has given a "source" (if you will) of morality that is not church-based. Her rule appears to be if something is not coercive, and serves a purpose, then it is okay (I'm sure she would also add harmful, of which coercive is a type, I think). And so, according to her worldview, it is NOT wrong.

This is the sort of thing I was talking about in my first post. Whether it's wrong or not depends on your worldview, in particular your "rules" (if you will) for determining what is right or wrong. And different people have different such "rules".

I'll let it rest now. (Unless I'm attacked or challenged again.)

Alex