"The claim was malicious."
The claim has been made by many people with whom you have debated (sic) that you refuse to read what people place before you, - you have a long reputation of ignoring what people put up because it doesn't suit your case.
You have either denied without proof, or totally ignored anything that doesn't suit your case, then you have gone on to claim that posters haven't provided proof.
This has become an increasingly habitual practice of yours lately.
Should Don bother (I certainly wouldn't) to put up his evidence again, it will be totally ignored, you will continue to filibust this thread and eventually claim that nobody has put up anything to back up their arguments.
This forum is scattered with threads on which you have done this - your efforts on the 'Traveller Signs' thread was breathtaking.
Honesty doesn't appear to be one of your virtues, though, going by your practice of denying things that are in full view for all to see, stupidity certainly is!
Jim Carroll