"YOU have applied the term "toxic"
No I haven't - the term toxic has been applied to the site in several (obviously once again unread by you, despite your having claimed to have "read them all") links.
I have given you the dictionary definition of "toxic"; I have given you the Israeli health authority's assessment of the site and I have itemized the calculated effect on the water supply, coming into contact with other gasses, including domestic and I have described the possible effects on children entering a poorly fenced rubbish dump
,font color=red>PLEASE STOP AVOIDING ALL THESE POINTS - IF WHAT I HAVE DESCRIBED IS WRONG, PLEASE SHOW WHY OR WITHDRAW YOUR NONSENSICALLY DISHONEST CLAIMS - ONE OR T'OTHER.
And please explain why the forcible mass movement of communities to where their health will be put at risk and where they will be unable to follow their way of life or make a living is not STATE FASCISM>
And please respond to all the other points regarding your mind-numbing claim that the Israeli denial is the only evidence available and is in any way to be regarded as evidence and that it is the only account of the massacre to be taken seriously.
WHERE ELSE ON THIS PLANET IS THE STATEMENT OF SOMEBODY ACCUSED OF A SERIOUS CRIME TO BE REGARDED AS THE ONLY EVIDENCE TO BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY - SINCE WHEN DO ACCUSED CRIMINALS GET TO TRY THEMSELVES AND FIND THEMSELVES NOT GUILTY?   
PLEASE STOP MAKING A FOOL OF YOURSELF IN PUBLIC - IT'S EMBARRASSING, FOR US, IF NOT FOR YOU.
Jim Carroll