Your selecting an Israeli propaganda page, a sort of Israeli Lord Haw-Haw (or Tokyo Rose, for our American cousins), has, for me at least, brought this topic to a satisfactory conclusion, probably for the time being as you clearly intend to break your own nauseatingly racist 'Muslim Prejudice' record by dragging this thread out for as long as you can by not answering questions put to you.
What parts of the Phoebe Greenwood article do I dispute? - I'll do you a deal I WILL BE HAPPY TO DEBATE HER AND THE GUARDIAN'S COVERAGE OF ISRAELI ATROCITIES, AND ANY SUGGESTION THAT EITHER SHE OR ONE OF BRITAIN'S FINEST NEWSPAPER'S IS IN ANY WAY "ANTISEMITIC" IF YOU WILL DIRECTLY ANSWER THE MANY UNANSWERED QUESTIONS AND UNACKNOWLEDGED EVIDENCE PUT BEFORE YOU REGARDING ISRAELI WAR CRIMES Can't say fairer than that.
Anyway, Phoebe Greenwood's coverage has been swamped by a tsunami of articles on Israel, toxic materials and the Bedouin, to which you have yet to respond or even acknowledge.   
I am grateful that your choosing it has opened up a whole new can of worms; that of the Israeli practice of using toxins in solving the "Bedouin problem", not only in the form of forcing them next to toxic sites, but also as aerial crop-destroying chemical sprays used on Bedouin food supplies - you have the links - you won't follow them through, or probably not even read them, but I have no doubt others will.
These links where hastily gathered; (didn't want to miss University Challenge) there appears to be page after page of such links.
And we hadn't even got round to discussing SKUNK, the chemical spray designed, among other things, to make homes uninhabitable.
""Skunk" is a malodorant, non-lethal weapon used for crowd control by the Israeli Defense Forces. Deriving its name from the animal of the same name, "Skunk" is dispersed as a form of mist, fired from a water cannon, which leaves a terrible odor of rot or sewage on whatever it touches. It does not wash off easily and is said to linger on clothes for up to five years.[1] First attempts at developing a scent-based form of crowd control began in Israel in 2004; Skunk was first used for crowd control in September 2008."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skunk_(weapon)
There was a recent article in the Irish Times (no doubt anther Antisemitic rag!!!) giving a description of its use.
Stone-throwers were sighted (aka invented), the truck turned up and sprayed the house (in this case a farmhouse), making it uninhabitable for possibly up to five years - a crude but effective land clearance technique - not sure where the UN stands on this form of chemical warfare against non-combatants.
This particular incident was filmed and photographed; no stone throwers were in evidence.
Anyway as you seem to have entered your 'Dalek' mode by refusing to qualify your arguments, answer questions directed to you, refute or even acknowledge direct proof put before you in form of (unread) links and cut-'n-pasted commentary; as far as I'm concerned there is little more to add at the present time.
BTW Nurse Ellen Siegal said it as she saw it - the Israeli soldiers witnessed the massacre over three days without attempting to stop it, and buried the bodies using Israeli bulldozers - it's in her letter - further participation in the massacre by Israeli troops is adequately covered elsewhere.
I certainly have no objection to her giving any evidence to any tribunal.
I'll leave you to it - off to Galway to hear about the songs arising from '1798' - have a good day y'all, d'ye hear
Jim Carroll