I am putting this up separately to give you the opportunity to settle your claims of "non toxicity" once and for all.
The toxicity (or non toxicity) of the site proposed for the forcible move of several thousand Bedouins is an act of State fascism in its own right before you take into consideration the nature of the site.
FACTS ABOUT TOXICITY BOTH FROM SCIENTIFIC INFORMATION AND REFERING TO THIS SITE IN PARTICULAR (including some facts from the Israelis themselves)
The gasses given off from this site will remain in the ground for years. possibly decades after its closure - If this is not true, provide some documented facts showing it is not the case
Their coming into contact with water produces a toxic mixture - any water in the area will already have been poisoned If this is not true, provide some documented facts showing it is not the case
The usual method of obtaining water in areas like this is to dig wells, any water for human consumption in this area will have long been polluted and toxic. - If this is not true, provide some documented facts showing it is not the case
Any water in this area for grazing livestock will will be polluted by toxins - If this is not true, provide some documented facts showing it is not the case
There have been no statements as to how the Israeli regime intends to irrigate this site - If this is not true, provide some documented facts showing it is not the case
If it flows overland it will become toxic - If this is not true, provide some documented facts showing it is not the case
The Israelis do not intend to embark on expensive projects to make this land habitable other than by bulldozing the existing rubbish into the ground otherwise they would have announced it when their intentions were made known, as a public relations exercise, if nothing else - If this is not true, provide some documented facts showing it is not the case
Children playing in this area will be exposed to the risk of coming into contact with rotting rubbish which could effect their health and even kill themIf this is not true, provide some documented facts showing it is not the case
Methane given off by this site, when coming into contact with certain other gasses, including those used for cooking or heating, become toxic and also run the risk of becoming explosive or highly inflammable - this has been stated by the Israeli health officials If this is not true, provide some documented facts showing it is not the case
Any one of these facts would make the site liable to the description "toxic" - there is no such thing as an "ordinary" non-toxic rubbish dump in the close proximity of human habitationIf this is not true, provide some documented facts showing it is not the case
Overall fact; had it not been for the public outcry and the threat of a war crimes charge, the Bedouins would have long ago been forcibly settled onto this site, or one similarly valueless and dangerous If this is not true, provide some documented facts showing it is not the case
Forcibly removing Bedouins in order to make homes for Jewish settlers is an act of extreme racism If this is not true, provide some documented facts showing it is not the case
Any act of forcibly removing a people from land they have occupied for centuries is one of state fascism If this is not true, provide some documented facts showing it is not the case
It was you who first introduced the Bedouins into this discussion to show the egalitarian nature of the State of Israel - bet you're sorry now that you did If this is not true, provide some documented facts showing it is not the case
If you are going to continue defending this act of ethnic cleansing, racism and state fascism, please provide links to genuine information and not just your own inventions.
You are not a spokesman for the State of Israel, merely an apologist for their war crimes and atrocities If this is not true, provide some documented facts showing it is not the case
Jim Carroll