you are fully aware of the toxic nature of the proposed forcible re-settlement, which is why you refuse to offer an alternative explanation by answering the list of definitions which make the site toxic, even though some of those descriptions are based on the Israeli's description of the site
No.
They are all harmless refuse sites except the one where there are unrecognised and illegal habitations.

"Do you deny it or not?"
Where did I ever state it Keith
Nowhere Jim.
That is why I ask "Do you deny it or not?"

Don, I absolutely accept that there are two sides.
You lot put up the anti-Israel view, and I raise no objections.
I reply with Israel's version, and you all throw your teddies out of your prams!