""that faintly ridiculous air of having triumphantly demonstrated what has merely been vigorously asserted"; together with the apparent [might one almost say 'paranoid'?] conviction that any who do not share his doctrinaire views must be part of some totalitarian conspiracy against what is, to all right-thinking people, the undisputed "good".""

Perhaps then Mike you would like to supply a rational, reasoned and logical response to the following question.

Why, in your opinion, does the above quote not apply equally to Keith, with his continual insistence that Israel is innocent because Israel said so?

Any and all evidence to the contrary is dismissed as the lies of antisemites, racists and bigots. He has in fact called me a racist, a bigot and an antisemite on many posts in this and other threads.

What makes his input different/more credible/less obnoxious than Jim's.

Don T.

Don T.