""if dawkins cant find any well qualified creationist scientists he certainly aint looking for them, and you are living in denial if you claim that there are,nt any""

Pete, Apart fom the services of a good English grammar coach, you also need a course in logical thought and expression.

There are indeed scientists, mostly of the airy fairy sciences on the fringe of the real scientific community, who are also creationists.

Your reversal of that idea to talk about ""Creation Scientists"" is a total nonsensical non sequitur.

There is no such thing as creation science.

The whole charade is based on a negation of science in which you start off with a belief and twist the facts to fit.

Science starts with an observation and well established principles of investigation and experiment are applied to the task of understanding what that observation means.

The results are what they are.

If they fit into the overall sum of scientific knowledge all well and good.

If they destroy an existing scientific structure, then the structure is changed to update and accommodate the new addition.

If you cannot understand the difference then it is a flaw in your thinking, not a flaw in the universal laws of physics.

Put as politely as possible, drop the ""Creation Science"" crap, it doesn't exist, and to suggest that it does is dishonest.

Don T.