Jews and Christians have an explicit commandment: Thou shalt not kill.

They do kill, however, and what allows them to do this is the special dispensation they grant themselves. It becomes acceptable when done in the service of the state. Is this what Moses taught? No. Jesus? Double no. This special dispensation is the result of state agendas in collusion with religion leaders themselves. These religious leaders have developed a certain mentality of "I'm a rabbi or a priest whereas you're a soldier." My job is to preach, yours to kill. Of course this is all hypocrisy, but the commandment remains intact.

Islam, on the other hand, says that it is permissable, even desirable, to kill infidels and to commit atrocities against women. It would appear that the vast majority of Muslims and their leaders have granted themselves special dispensation to avoid such acts, but the commandment remains intact.

The difference is in the standard. Make no mistake, Islam is a false religion. What I would like to do is pick up some of you, drop you off in Pakistan, pick you up in about a year (if you're still alive) and see what you have to say then. Some of you hate Jews but others feel compelled to defend who they see as the underdog. Those people need to learn that being the underdog is no guarantee of virtue.

I knew this girl who got involved with a disabled man. He subjected her to hardcore verbal abuse to the point where I believe if he had been physically able to, he would have subjected her to a whole lot worse. Certain people ought not to have certain caoabilities I'd say. As guilty as she felt, she eventually had to walk away. Who was the underdog there? The one who appeared to be at a disadvantage or the one who actually was?

David the Cossack Gnome, take a break:

Ой чий то кінь стоїть