firstly the reducing of darwinism to 2 sentances was referencing a quote from steve,though i did not look back for the exact words.

Well, if it's me you're cackling on about, I said two lines, not two sentances [sic]. Would you like it? Do ask. And you never do "look back". You never "have time". You're always doing something else. Singing anti-abortion songs or something, I suppose. Either that, or (as I strongly suspect), you're just a lazy bastard who relies on the words of your equally-lazy fellow-traveller bigots.

I'll ignore the total bollocks you addressed to Howard (he must be cringeing) and turn to this gem:

steve is still equivelating [and ian] between evolutionism and natural selection.the latter of course was all darwin had to go on,something darwin may have "borrowed" from the creationist edward blythe.

"Equivelating", huh? Why, what word is this? You know something, you creationist arsehole? You are the rudest and laziest man that has ever posted on this forum. The message of yours I'm quoting from here is the stupidest and most incoherently-ungrammatical I've had the misfortune to read in years. Surely there's a hole somewhere nearby you can crawl into, thereby doing us all a bloody big favour. Actually, no. Do go on. We atheists look pretty good already, but you make us all look ten times better.