""Equivelating", huh? Why, what word is this? You know something, you creationist arsehole? You are the rudest and laziest man that has ever posted on this forum. The message of yours I'm quoting from here is the stupidest and most incoherently-ungrammatical I've had the misfortune to read in years. Surely there's a hole somewhere nearby you can crawl into, thereby doing us all a bloody big favour. Actually, no. Do go on. We atheists look pretty good already, but you make us all look ten times better"

I am sure he meant "Equating." Do you have the courage to address his point after that obvious and easy correction? I don't think so. No, easier for you, the great scientist/educator/anti-religious scholar to feign outrage over a simple grammatical error.

As for who is "rude and lazy" pete isn't the one spewing a stream of lazy, ignorant, unfounded insults. Pete has a lot of faults in his grammar, but he speaks politely and modestly. That is way more than can be said for you.