Bobert,


"1. I challenged you to use your wildest imagination to explain a situation where Martin's pictures that were taken well before he was murdered amounted to evidence... You didn't answer that question at all... You just played silly..."


I GAVE you the text message that I thought would be significant evidence- which you ignored.



"2. Then you say that Zimmerman had a right to defend himself from getting his pounded in the ground... First, if you come at me with a gun and I can find a way to defend myself then guess what... If it means pounding your head in the ground I'm gonna do it... Duhhhhh???"


IF he had the gun out. IF he had it concealed, and called out, AND WAS ATTACKED by Martin, he WAS defending himself.




"3. Bottom line, had Zimmerman ************OBEYED************* the police and stayed in his fucking car then two things would not have occurred that night... First, there would have been no self-defense my Martin and, two, Martin would not have murdered Martin...


THIS I agree with. As do MOST here that you refuse to be reasonable in this discussion with.

I stated it was a BAD DECISION.



Now, about the thread topic.

1.
DO YOU AGREE that the procecutor has now made it easier for Zimmerman to get off,

2. and that the ILLEGAL withholding of evidence from the defense was WRONG????


Two YES or NO questions.