Again, Bobert, you attack me and do not discuss the answer I gave to your question. As this is not the first time, I have to conclude that you agree it is reason enough to be evidence, and thus you are an asshole for your continued discussion about "Pictures not being evidence " when the point is

***   Evidence being withheld by the Prosecution. ***

"
Shear numbers of posts do not strengthen your arguments, bb...

If you can't make a point with a single post then that points to nothing but spin and more spin...
"

And how many times are you going to bring up the non-relevant pictures? Sheer numbers of posts do not strengthen your ( nonexistent) argument.

If you can't make a point with a single post then that points to nothing but spin and more spin... As someone I used to have some respect for once said.