No, Keith, I don't think "evidence" should be withheld... What I am saying is that whatever was on Martin's phone - unless it implicated that he knew Zimmerman and/or planned on hurting Zimmerman - is not evidence...

Richard Bridge, who is also an attorney, says it isn't evidence...

Seems the only folks who think it is evidence are the same people who didn't think Zimmerman should have been charged in the first place and that was long before anyone knew about Martin's cell phone...

Hmmmmm??? Seems that these folks have major prejudicial leanings about what really happened... Reminds me of the stuff that used to go on here in the South...

But again, Keith... Why is anything that Martin did prior to being murdered relevant to the case???

Please use facts and not irrational arguments that have been made here before that are not facts but obvious and ***admittedly*** fictional scenarios...

B~