The Mudcat Café TM
Thread #150984   Message #3535889
Posted By: GUEST,Guest from Sanity
10-Jul-13 - 11:37 AM
Thread Name: BS: George Zimmerman defense-' Evidence withheld'
Subject: RE: BS: Zimmerman defense-' Evidence withheld'
Once again, Don T is proud to show how stupid he is!

Don T:

"Not just what will acquit a man who:-

"1. Ignored advice to leave the police to do their job."

    Not Illegal..bad judgement, but bot illegal

"2. Racially profiled and confronted a subject."

That is a jump to conclusions,,AND not illegal!

"3. Shot an unarmed schoolboy."

A. He wasn't in school, so play the sympathetic game... B..and your little unarmed 'schoolboy', was six inches taller than Zimmerman, on top of him beating the crap out of him..THAT IS WHAT THE TRIAL IS ABOUT...the question of self defense or not!

4. Went to work with a loaded gun which, it has been said, is against neighbourhood watch policy.

'It has been said'???? Huh??? Against 'neighbourhood watch policy' is not in itself a crime.

EVERYTHING you posted has very little to do with anything other than circumstantial hearsay..adjectives. A trial is supposed to judge the accounts of witnesses, to determine if the accused is guilty as charged. Eulogies and platitudes are not evidence to the facts. The fact that you bring that up in here, is evidence of something else...but that's another story....

GfS