Sorry, Bobert.

If a black man were convicted on as little evidence as has been presented, you would be ( rightfully) screaming about the rush to judgement.

There were two prosecution experts and three defense experts who were ready to testify- the judge determined that NONE ( emphasis, not shouting) could accurately determine who it was screaming, and presented testimony from one expert to that effect, letting the jury know that someone who knew the screamer might be able to tell. It is up to the jury as to whether the cries are believed to be from Martin or Zimmerman- NOT ( emphasis) you.

You have wanted this whole trial to be overturned, advocating illegal actions by the prosecution that would throw it out. You have stated that the only "fair" verdict would be conviction of Zimmerman, regardless of the evidence and his guilt.
Please tell me how, other than the color of the people you hate, you are any different from those Klansmen that lynched blacks they "knew' were guilty? Why have a trial, if you will only accept your predetermined result?