I am stunned. There is now a move afoot to bring civil charges against him, as was successfully done in the OJ case.

The indisputable fact is that this man killed an unarmed person. If he had not been carrying a loaded weapon this would not have happened.

If he had not been armed and the whole incident had taken place as described, #1: he would probably not have followed him in the first place and just reported in as he was supposed to do. #2: if there had been a confrontation he would probably have more conciliatory and/or have fled.

Frankly, I believe he unholstered his gun before the confrontation- as has been made clear by a number of persons, it is virtually impossible that he got to his gun while lying on the ground.

Ain't the "equalizer" wonderful?