If I am out of step, please tell me how.
Suzy and mg, if I have offended, please help me not to do it again.

Was it wrong of me to point out that historians are divided?
Was it wrong of me to give those brief, short quotes?
I did it in neutral and unprovocative posts, but was subjected to an abusive attack.
Do you condone that.

Should I refrain from any contribution because Jim Carroll is incapable of dealing rationally with an alternative viewpoint?

Suzy and mg, I expect such treatment from Jim, but I did not expect it from you.
Again, please, what have I done?