Joe... "... and what's the benefit of prosecuting a 30-year-old crime."

$ and the fact that it's word against word... unless they have proof of the porno stuff. Either way, he's gonns get fried so it's all about who can get how much $ before there's none left.

30 years after the fact a bunch of people step forward and accuse someone of terrible crimes with no evidence but words and hearsay? I find that kinda shit sickening. If enough people say it is true, it must be true??? BULLSHIT! If there is evidence of possession of child pornography or of making same, fry the bastard for those crimes. But those people who come to feast on his carcass after 30 years of silence with NO evidence???... fuck em. THEY should be charged for frivolous procedings.