Pete, there are no goal posts. Science is an incremental process that takes time, as research needs to be done, written up, published, peer-reviewed, re-tested by other scientists and developed upon. The continued use of phrases like 'Darwinists' and the laughable 'deep time dogma'.

If intact DNA was found and proved to be more durable than we thought, why would that challenge the existence of 'deep time'? It might challenge my understanding of the robustness of the DNA molecule, but that's fine as I am open to be challenged.

I don't believe in your god as there is not a single datum I am aware of indicating his/hers/its existence. By all means, point me to peer-reviewed research published in a scientific journal that might challenge this position. My betting is you won't.