Steve Shaw

Ah yes, indeed I did! (took me 20 minutes to find it and I don't recommend the search).

I suggest you get a new service provider. It shouldn't have taken 20 minutes to follow the link I gave you.

Now do apprise us of the context of that remark of mine, which was directed at you purely as a richly-deserved piss-take!

Really? As an amplification of your usual mantra, it sounds more as if you were taking the piss out of yourself.

But yes, I did say it. Guilty as charged, yerronner...

Historic day. Steve Shaw admits he's wrong about something.

Anyway, now we've got that out of the way, perhaps you' like to respond to the quotes from Stu and Shimrod I posted earlier. To save you spending twenty minutes looking for it, here's the post thread.cfm?threadid=152125&messages=456#3565608.

Stu and Shimrod

In that post, I quote examples of good scientific thinking from the two of you. Steve responded with "You're either prattling away at me or prattling away about you flavour-of-the-month philosopher, you sad thing you." Seems he doesn't think much of your contributions. He now says "I was referring to that falsifiability chap that he's wont to rattle on about." He means Sir Karl Popper, probably the greatest philosopher of science of the twentieth century and originator of the concept of falsifiability. Steve seems to think he knows better.