"In order to discount that much of the stuff mentioned in the article I posted is bullying, you have to assume that it ALL IS POSTED ONLY BY THOSE with the specific intent to intimidate witnesses for the purpose of affecting legal processes."

Bullies very often have a purpose in bullying, and I'm struggling to see the difference, in Musket's opinion, between the school bully grabbing his victim's dinner money and the criminal stopping a witness testifying.

So even if it IS witness intimidation, is that not bullying for a purpose?