You have been given masses of evidence from historians, journalists, writers and participantsYou have been given masses of evidence from historians, journalists, writers and participants
Not true.
Just anon., unverified Wiki pages, and one participant out of 2 million.
I alone have referenced actual historians of the event.

- those who don't fit your squalid theories you have dismissed as "romantics" "revisionists" and liars
Lie. I have not.
And I have no theory.
I just believe the historians.
Only a deluded, egotistical fool would think he knew more than them.
Like you two do.

You don't read, you admit you are ignorant of the subjects you pollute, you don't have the courage to stand by your statements as your own, but scurry behind "experts" and "historians"

I am not at all ignorant about thise.
It is a lifelong interest of mine and I have read widely.
That is why I know what the historians all say.
You people know nothing.

you never produce valid, solid evidence for anything you claim

Lie.
Everything I claimed is supported by the works of historians.